 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted By:
Hal Brown
Date Posted:
Jan 11, 2005
Description:
This was a bounce, actually, but the next time it stayed down. (For good.)
Date Taken:
Jan 11, 2005
Place Taken:
Owner:
File Name:
Untitled___18.jpg - Photo HTML
Full size - <img src="/show.php?splash=SZYE80000h">
Medium - <img src="/show.php?splash=SZYE80000m">
Thumbnail - <img src="/show.php?splash=SZYE80000s">
Category:
95, Other Seaplanes
|
|
|
|
|
Click on photo to view the original size. |
| Viewers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Read what others had to say:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Dan Nickens - Jan 11,2005
Viewers
| Reply
|
| |
Have you been to the movies recently, Don?
| | |
|
Don Maxwell - Jan 12,2005
Viewers
| Reply
|
| |
Well, yeah, Dan, I did go to see <I>The Aviator. </I>But these frames are ripped from the DVD, <I>Howard Hughes: The Real Aviator.</I> I don't know which came first (or, for that matter, which represents Hughes more accurately). But I thought Frank Gracy ought to see what a <I>real</I> heavy flying boat looks like.<!-- >'"><br><font color=red size=6>' or > missing in user HTML. Please fix the HTML.</font> -->
| | |
|
Dan Nickens - Jan 12,2005
Viewers
| Reply
|
| |
Sure, Don, it's heavy but with 2,352 Ballistic Recovery Shoots it should be safe to fly.
| | |
|
Charlie Huskey - Jan 12,2005
Viewers
| Reply
|
| |
You guys do know that BRS has built a 5000 sq ft chute already. It worked perfectly when deployed.
| | |
|
Charlie Huskey - Jan 12,2005
Viewers
| Reply
|
| |
May have my WIRES crossed here, that may have been Performance Design that made the 5000 sq ft chute for NASA.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
