|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Click on photo to view the original size. |
Viewers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Read what others had to say:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth Leonard - Sep 18,2008
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
So what does it look like from below? I mean, really, so long as there isn't anyone with a parachute standing on the edge of the bridge, how could you resist?
| | |
|
Don Maxwell - Sep 18,2008
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Hm. Could it be legal to fly under a bridge that is, say, 600 feet above the water?
| | |
|
Dan Nickens - Sep 18,2008
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Technically, Don, you could make the argument that applicable FAA regulations permit passing that close to people or structures as long as you are 'landing or taking off.' Practically, however, I'd bet you'd get a letter referencing the 'careless and reckless' clause (at least that is what happened to the one seaplane pilot I have heard of doing the below bridge thing). Apparently some bureaucrats have no sense of adventure
| | |
|
Don Maxwell - Sep 19,2008
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Some? ALL--by definition! <br /><br />bu·reau·crat n. <br /><br /> 1. An official of a bureaucracy.<br /> 2. An official who is rigidly devoted to the details of administrative procedure.<br /><br />(American Heritage Dictionary)<br />
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|