|
|
Photos
View |
|
All Photos |
Add Photos |
Emoticons |
Album View |
Mark Unread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Click on photo to view the original size. |
Viewers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Read what others had to say:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Nickens - May 18,2009
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Beauty, Don! And thanks for all the other fine photos of the fly in.
| | |
|
Don Maxwell - May 18,2009
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
I forgot to mention that they said this was to be the first ANNUAL show: <a href="http://www.militaryaviationmuseum.org/events_airshow.html">http://www.militaryaviationmuseum.org/events_airshow.html</a><br /><br />I didn't notice until too late that for this weekend only they allowed GA airplanes to land on their runway.<br /><br />Here's the poster for 2009: <a href="http://www.militaryaviationmuseum.org/source/images/media/Va%20Beach%20Airshow.jpg">http://www.militaryaviationmuseum.org/source/images/media/Va<br>%20Beach%20Airshow.jpg</a><br /><br />I'm looking forward to 2010.
| | |
|
Chris Vernon-Jarvis - May 19,2009
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
I think the condensation trails on any aircraft are fascinating. It was years before I understood just how quickly the condensation forms and dissolves, just see a flyby by a Buccaneer (the RNAS version!) with its high wing loading. Last Jan we went to Las Vegas and on take off from Vancouver there were wonderful patterns around the engine intakes and the leading edge.<br /><br />What is interesting in the picture is how widely spaced and even the spirals are.
| | |
|
Eric Batterman - May 19,2009
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
This is what I see when I look out the window...<img src="inline/20053-gremlin.jpg" alt="gremlin"><!-- >'"><br><font color=red size=6>' or > missing in user HTML. Please fix the HTML.</font> -->
| | Attachments:
gremlin
| | |
|
Don Maxwell - May 19,2009
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Find a brick.
| | |
|
Don Maxwell - May 19,2009
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
I grew up seeing condensation trails in comic books and thought they were just the artists' way of suggesting speed. Had no idea they were real. Then a relative took me to the Cleveland Air Races when I was 12, and I saw them streaming off the wings of the Thompson Trophy racers as they rolled almost knife-edge and pulled around the final pylon, right in front of the grandstand. The condensation trails, the sound of those big engines, and all--amazing, astonishing!
| | |
|
Don Maxwell - May 19,2009
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
At first I thought these spiral condensation trails were a digital camera artifact. If you watch the video, you'll see how the camera 'slowed' the prop drastically. And some digital photos of very fast motion look bizarre because the sensor is scanned one line at a time, so the image may be wildly distorted. Prop blades on SeaReys, for example, sometimes look like cubist boomerangs. But it turned out to be the real thing.<br /><br />I think. I saw the phenomenon only through the camera, and I didn't hear anyone remark about it at the time. It's possible that they might not have been visible to the naked human eye. But the camera 'sees' into the near-infrared. (You can make a video of a tv remote's infra-red LED.) So it's possible that NObody saw these trails.<br /><br />It might be possible to calculate the various speeds here, and the prop pitch. The prop has three blades, each maybe--what?--5 feet long? And in this frame (and in the video) the engine must have been turning well above 3000 rpm, maybe closer to 3500. So the blade tip speed was probably close to Mach 1. I'm not sure at what airspeed a Hurricane's tail will come up on takeoff--50 knots, maybe? The camera (a Canon still cam with 640x480 video) was running at 30 frames per second, but I don't know what the actual scan rate is, other than that it repeats 30 times per second. Well, that's about as far as I go today.
| | |
|
Chris Vernon-Jarvis - May 19,2009
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
You can see the shutter speed in the length of the actual prop tips (The yellow flashes) Assuming all three blades are making the spirals you could estimate the pitch against the fuselage length.Say about a quarter of the fuselage, maybe seven of eight feet, however that varies during the take off. Obviously forward motion starts as zero and at 250 knots would be far longer and then there is the actual variable pitch to think about. Probably too many variables for a simple mind.<br /><br />One thing I have noticed with the Merlin is how it sounds different in a Spitfire. With all the other aircraft it was in it sounds loud and throaty but in a Spitfire it seems you can almost hear the mechanical parts individually and it is, perhaps, more crackly departing. Maybe something to do with the closeness of the cowl or the sleekness of the airframe. I don't hold any particular brief for the Spitfire, as an effective weapon it probably cost far more to build than was sensible but it maybe made up for that as a morale builder. Sometimes, in war, the intangibles are as important as the tangibles.
| | |
|
Don Maxwell - May 19,2009
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
For those with too much time on their hands, I've posted a slo-mo version of the video in File Cabinet.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- About Searey.us -
- Contact Searey.us -
|
- Privacy Statement -
- Terms of service -
|
Copyright © 2024 Searey.us & Brevard Web Pro, Inc. -
Copyrights may also be reserved by posters and used by license on this site. See Terms of Service for more information.
|
|
- Please visit our NEW
Chapter Place Website at: chapterplace.com or
Free Chapter Management Website at: ourchapter.org. Good for all chapters, groups or families. |
| | | | |