|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Click on photo to view the original size. |
Viewers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Read what others had to say:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
It’s Michael Smith’s fault. First, he goes around the world in his SeaRey. Then he spends a lot of time finding a capable seaplane that would give him a similar experience that he could share with a passenger. When he told me he was taking delivery of a replacement for his well-proven SeaRey, I had to go check it out.
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Can a twin engine seaplane actually be fun to fly?
The Aircam is a great example of a twin that’s fun to fly. You can do many of the same things as a SeaRey with one on amphibious floats. The flip side is you have to pay twice the fuel and maintenance, but the performance is similar. And if you’re flying over a place you don’t want to land, well, the second windmill can be a reassurance against an ill-timed emergency landing.
How much is that worth? Probably not a lot for most of the flying we do in a SeaRey. But what if you want to go somewhere far away? And remote?
Michael Smith literally wrote the book on that. And made the movie too. After doing it, though, he wanted to take someone along with him to share the experience. That’s something he couldn’t do in the SeaRey.
Instead he found a SeaBear. The LA-65. From Samara, Russia, center of Russia’s aerospace industry.
For a few days at the end of September Mike was nice enough to share in the exotic, lovely machine he’d found. And, to answer my question, it is fun to fly. Or, I should more accurately say, it’s going to be FUN to FLY a LOT!
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Michael’s new SeaBear is the latest model of seaplane from a company that has been building Russian seaplanes for twenty years. Its engineer told me that it is the company’s crowning achievement. I didn’t get to fly the others, but this one would make a good crown for any light aircraft company.
Here is a side-by-side comparison with one of the earlier models, a LA-45. The LA-64 is a bit longer, a bit wider wing span, carries a heavier load and flies a bit faster. The thing is that the longer hull improves already impressive water characteristics.
| | |
|
Don Maxwell - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
The new one looks much sleeker. Very nice. (And it hardly reminds me at all of how a Searey might look if something went wrong during construction--so much less like that single-engined one that looked like a Searey with a tractor engine.)
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
You mean the Borey? It’s made by another Russian company: AeroVolga. Got to fly that too. Pictures to follow.
| | |
|
Ken Leonard - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
So the LA-45 isn’t rotax engine though, right? Those were lycoming if I remember correctly.
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Negative. The L-45 comes with Rotax 912S or 914. Those on the L-65 are twin 915iS engines and they fit perfectly with this airframe.
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Just to be clear, Ken, they did say they could mount Lycomings (and maybe they have) but I was also told the Rotax engines work best because of the power to weight ratio. In their view the 915iS is what makes the SeaBear the awesome performer it is (well, that and the long wing).
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
The airplane is not your conventional looking seaplane. The twin V tail with over-the-top horizontal stab and elevator gives it a distinctive look of its own.
What about the people behind the plane? Dimitri owns the company and is its test pilot. You can tell by the hat!
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
The engineer that guided us around has a degree in aeronautical engineering from the university in Samara. He says it was the center of Soviet aerospace, and so there is a lot of technical expertise in the area. That’s him in the middle trying to explain aerodynamics to Kevin and I.
| | |
|
Don Maxwell - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
да здравÑтвует ДÑн ÐиккенÑ! Or, alternatively and paraphrasing the Blues Brothers, "We're on a mission from Бог."
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
If there was a mission, Don, it was not reflected in these preposterously fake faces!
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Michael Smith is one of the most gracious gentlemen I know. He’s also fool-hearty: he let me fly his new airplane. I went up with Dmitry to insure I didn’t break it.
We were at a private airfield under the Samara airport control zone. Dmitri filed a flight plan. We were off before the filed time, however, so what to do? Low passes over the airfield and circuits at 300’!
When we got our clearance to depart we still had to remain low. We followed a road westward at 300’ (or 100 meters, actually). Legally. Amazing.
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
It wasn’t very far to the Volga River. After we got over the river we could climb up to 500’, but why? The scenery at down low with the fall colors was spectacular.
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
What’s the point to flying a seaplane if you can’t splash on the water? We did. Six times. I was guessing Dmitri thought I needed the practice. I didn’t because landing the SeaBear is like landing the SeaRey: natural and easy!
And when you’ve landed, you can climb out of the hatch and walk around on top of the airplane prolonging the enjoyment.
| | |
|
Philip Mendelson - Oct 12,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Very Dapper, can we say Bond? as in Dan Nick Bond?
| | |
|
Don Maxwell - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Yes, I loved that tail right from the start (in the first version). It's the only tail I've ever seen with the horizontal stabilizer on the top that looks strong. (Compare the Icon's T-tail that broke off recently.)
| | |
|
Russ Garner - Oct 06,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Butt heavy needs two engines to get its ass in the air.
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 06,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
That’s funny, Russ. Not true, but funny.
| | |
|
Russ Garner - Oct 07,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
LOL
| | |
|
Ken Leonard - Oct 06,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Agree that the tail looks to be the strongest design feature of the plane. I saw a picture of the internal hull structure under the floor at some point and that area also follows the typical Russian aircraft design of “way stronger than you should need and then some moreâ€.
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
It’s a seriously strong tail, Don (matching the rest of the plane).
| | |
|
Mark MacKinnon - Oct 06,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
But how heavy is it Dan? What's it's useful load?
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 06,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
It’s strong but light (for a twin), Mark. I’ll post the tech specs on STS.
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
I love this airplane! I’ve gotta get me one of these!
| | |
|
Don Maxwell - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
How's its ground handling, Dan? Maybe it's the camera's perspective--but it looks like there's a lot of weight up high, with narrow main gear and not much distance between the mains and the tail wheel.
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
This is still hard for me to believe, Don, but Michael allowed me to fly it before he did. Dimitri had the good sense to make the runway landing on a short runway in a strong crosswind. When I have time to be more serious I’ll post additional information about specific characteristics on the technical site.
| | |
|
Ken Leonard - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Very cool Dan. I had my wife 1/2 convinced to travel to Russia with me a year ago to fly this. Not sure what the registration hassles would be in the states, but it looks like a great motor home for the wife and me to explore in.
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Seems as if we both have some wife convincing to do, Ken. This machine is the perfect Seaplane RV.
| | |
|
Dennis Scearce - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
What's the cost in USD? Couldn't find a used n on Barnstormers.
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Kevin Oakes is talking with them about importing the 51% kit.
| | |
|
Neil Robertson - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
I think it’s a pretty cool plane in a lot of different ways. Is there another point of egress or just the aft hatch way?
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 05,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Yes, there’s an overhead hatch above the cockpit.
| | |
|
Jon Ladd - Oct 07,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
That can’t be you Dan, I have ever seen you flying with gear down.
| | |
|
Dennis Scearce - Oct 08,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
WUFF in Russian is .....WUFF
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 07,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
It’s true, Jon. I’m afflicted with a severe form of GUC (Gear Up Compulsion). It’s not so bad though when I’m on the ground taking pictures of normal pilots.
| | |
|
Daniel Myers - Oct 08,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
https://seaplanemagazine.com/2019/09/26/ack-62-new-russian-twin-engine-seaplane/
I still like Michael's plane better
| | Attachments:
ACK-62
| | |
|
Nickens, Dan - Oct 08,2019
Viewers
| Reply
|
|
Valentine and I discussed the ACK-62, Daniel. He said he has worked with them on the design. While he was complimentary he said the company still has some issues to work out with the airplane. It looks great but like you I think Michael made the right choice.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- About Searey.us -
- Contact Searey.us -
|
- Privacy Statement -
- Terms of service -
|
Copyright © 2024 Searey.us & Brevard Web Pro, Inc. -
Copyrights may also be reserved by posters and used by license on this site. See Terms of Service for more information.
|
|
- Please visit our NEW
Chapter Place Website at: chapterplace.com or
Free Chapter Management Website at: ourchapter.org. Good for all chapters, groups or families. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |