Splash and Dash Searey Seaplane Delights
                           May 15 1:03
Guest User - Request Membership Layout | Log In | Help | Videos | Site | Emails 
Search:  

 News
View
All News | Add News | Emoticons | Mark Unread
Search News:     
Category:

Previous ThreadPrevious Item - Georgian Gaggle 2006

This will go to the previous thread in this topic.
     
Favorite option: If you want this item to be marked as a favorite, click on the black heart.   AP spin on Sport Pilot rule...         Next ThreadNext Item - SeaRey Sim is here!!

This will go to the next thread in this topic.
  
Bret Smith - Mar 21,2006   Viewers  | Reply
    Older Pilots More Likely to Crash, Study Finds

OlderPilots More Likely to Crash, Study FindsTop of Form

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published: March 19,2006

GeorgeWidman/Associated Press

Philip Semischbegan flying about 20 years ago, at age 50. He crashed several years ago butsays he still feels confident about his skills.

At 50, Philip Semisch learned to fly. He took stunt-flying lessons on his60th birthday. When he turned 70, he flew gliders. Another aviation milestonefollowed just a few years later: He crashed.

Skip to nextparagraph Mr. Semisch,a retired Army officer and manufacturing executive from Skippack, Pa.,was alone, flying a small Decathlon plane in 2002. The plane bounced twice ashe tried to land. As he took it back up for another attempt, he failed to cleara wall of trees and crashed. He walked away with bruises and a few stitches.

Mr. Semisch'saccident was one of hundreds in recent years that illustrate a trend within thegeneral aviation industry: a disproportionate number of crashes among olderprivate pilots, despite their confidence.

The Associated Press analyzedfive years of federal pilot licensing documents and aviation crash data, andits findings showed that pilots in older age groups were significantly morelikely to be involved in a crash.

The study began after theFederal Aviation Administration changed its rules in September 2004, making iteasier for older pilots to obtain and keep licenses to fly certain smallerplanes. Although the pilots must still pass regular flight tests, the ruleeases medical restrictions, allowing pilots to fly using only a driver'slicense as proof of good health.

The study found that:

¶ Pilots 60 and olderaccounted for 24 percent of general aviation accidents, though they were just15 percent of licensed pilots.

¶ Pilots 50 and olderwere in 56 percent of general aviation accidents that led to fatalities, butthey make up only 37 percent of licensed pilots.

Experts widely acknowledgethat about three-quarters of aviation accidents are caused by some kind ofpilot error, including slower reactions that can come with age.

Many pilots interviewed forthis article defended older pilots, saying wisdom and experience more than madeup for any age-related forgetfulness or decline in motor skills.

'The statistics don'tsupport planes falling out of the sky,' said Phil Boyer, president of theAircraft Owners and Pilots Association.

There has been only onemajor jetliner accident in the nation in the last three years — at MidwayAirport in Chicago — but crashes of small planes have become nearlyroutine. On an average day in 2005, there were four general aviation accidents,with at least one death.

More than 500 people havedied in general aviation crashes in each of the past three years. Incomparison, more than 30,000 people die each year in car and truck accidents.

Some pilots said that evenunder the old rule, older pilots could find doctors who would perform only arudimentary exam. Fred Austin, 60, of Sedona, Ariz., said one doctor would havehim hop on one foot for a few seconds: 'Then he'd stand a few feet awayand whisper, 'Fred,' to check your hearing. That's all it took.'

<!-- >'"><br><font color=red size=6>' or &gt; missing in user HTML. Please fix the HTML.</font> -->
     Attachments:  

p><p class=MsoNormal style=''line-height:125%''><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shape id="_x0000_s1026" type="#_x0000_t75
p><p class=MsoNormal style=''line-height:125%''><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shape id="_x0000_s1026" type="#_x0000_t75


    
  
Kenneth Leonard - Mar 22,2006   Viewers  | Reply
    Interesting article. Total hogwash, but interesting in the fact that because AP put it in writing, it's now 'FACT' and for sure, somebody is going to pound older pilots over the head with it. I'll take judgement over a split second faster reaction time every day of the week.     
  
Chris Vernon-Jarvis - Mar 23,2006   Viewers  | Reply
    There was a similar study in the UK with results that were trumpeted as the same, (Headline: 'Older pilots have more accidents') however the paperss neglected to mention that the numbers were even higher for pilots between 18 &amp; 26.<br /><br />There is another distorting factor. I read all too frequently of new retirees who are finally living their dream learning to fly and building a plane. They are usually a rather unsuitable type and the next thing I read is a report of their crash, often during the first flight. (As a low time, retiree, amateur builder this worries me considerably. (Christine just makes sure the insurance is paid up, there may be a message here.) Also hours flown per year fall off as pilots get older (average hours flown pa) down to about 40 hpa for pilots 55 to 65 as opposed to hundreds for pilots between 35 and 45 and there ar many fewer licensed older pilots. (In the UK mere hundreds.) That means that the number of 'lowhour amateur build retiree first flights is very, very disproportionate.<br /><br />If we are questioning the easing of pilot licences, which applied to all ages, not just older pilots, the question would be how many of those accidents were caused by medical events. Generally the experience with cars and the original figures used to justify the easing of medical qualification would appear to show that the risk was not significantly increased. Most accidents were due to pilot error rather than incapacitation.     
  
Bret Smith - Mar 23,2006   Viewers  | Reply
    If you want to gauge your own personal risk factor, then look no farther than your insurance statement. Those bastards (bless their hearts) know when somebody is primed to cost them a buck... <br /><br />It takes me an hour or so to fill out my renewal questionaire every year; Total time, time in last 30, 60, 90, 365 days, time in type, seaplane time in the last 30, 60 90 365 days, etc, etc... they're looking at a lot more than age.<br /><br />...I apologize to those among us that may be in the insurance biz If its any colsolation, my dad is lawyer... oops, sorry to those guys too     
  
Philip Mendelson - Mar 23,2006   Viewers  | Reply
    Hey Gang, normally I do not reply to these 'slanted articles' However Philip Semish<br />the pilot involved in this accident I happen to know thru his son Kevin. There is one major fact that, I felt was being down played by the 'media'. This man did not start flying as a pilot until he was in his fifty's! He actually is a 'low time' pilot. All of us know that inexperience and poor judgement will always lead to problems!     

       - About Searey.us -
     - Contact Searey.us -
- Privacy Statement -
- Terms of service -
Copyright © 2024 Searey.us & Brevard Web Pro, Inc. - Copyrights may also be reserved
by posters and used by license on this site. See Terms of Service for more information.
    - Please visit our NEW Chapter Place Website at: chapterplace.com or Free Chapter Management Website at: ourchapter.org. Good for all chapters, groups or families.